As we blogged about here, the EEOC issued a revised version of its publication What you Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws. Among the several issues addressed in the EEOC's latest update, there are new rules to address managing reasonable accommodation requests from those returning to the worksite and from those wanting to continue to work from home.
Reasonable Accommodations Under the ADA For Individuals with "Higher Risk of Severe Illness"
The EEOC's guidance on reasonable accommodations was updated on May 5, 2020, and supplemented on May 7, 2020, to specifically address concerns involving individuals with certain medical conditions at a "higher risk of severe illness."
The EEOC looks to the CDC's definition for individuals with medical conditions having a "higher risk for severe illness." Such people include those with medical conditions that are 65 years and older and people of all ages with underlying medical conditions such as chronic lung disease or moderate to severe asthma, serious heart conditions, immunocompromised individuals, obesity, diabetes, kidney disease, and liver disease.
Assuming an employee with a medical condition having a "higher risk of severe illness" makes an accommodation request, an employer's obligation to accommodate and engage in the interactive process are required per the EEOC guidance. The request may come from the employee or the employee's physician. After receiving a request, an employer must engage in the interactive process with the employee, The EEOC's guidance on specific circumstances continues to evolve.
For example, if a job can be performed at only the workplace, the EEOC has recommended some accommodations on a temporary basis without causing an undue hardship, e.g., a "low cost" physical alterations of the workplace (one-way aisles, using Plexiglas barriers) or temporary job restrictions on marginal duties, temporary transfers, or modified work schedules.
Employers are also encouraged to be flexible in terms of requesting medical documentation and engaging in the interactive process. This could include providing accommodations on a temporary basis and even placing an "end date" on the accommodation. With respect to medical documentation, the EEOC has underscored, "for employers seeking documentation from a health care provider to support the employee's request, they should remember that because of the health crisis many doctors may have difficulty responding quickly. There may be other ways to verify the existence of a disability. For example, a health insurance record or a prescription may document the existence of the disability."
In the event an employer is considering keeping an employee out of the workplace because the employee has a "higher risk for severe illness," the rules are far stricter. The EEOC requires: (1) application of the "direct threat" standard; and (2) there must be an "individualized assessment based on a reasonable medical judgment about this employee's disability-not the disability in general-using the most current medical knowledge and/or the best available objective evidence."
Even assuming that an employee's disability "poses a direct threat to his own health," the EEOC expects employers to explore potential reasonable accommodations absent an undue hardship. Using the interactive process, the first goal is to find a way to return an employee to work while still performing the position's essential functions. When return to work is not available, an employer needs to consider other types of accommodations: telework, leave, or reassignment.
Barring an employee from the workplace must be viewed as a last resort, only when "the facts support the conclusion that the employee poses a significant risk of harm to himself that cannot be reduced or eliminated by reasonable accommodation."
New Rules on the Horizon
What's next? Selecting a pared-down workforce? Employee-mandated vaccines? The employment setting is constantly changing, and we are all dealing with the "new normal."
Whether an employer is deciding which employees to return from a layoff or furlough or selecting employees for layoff to reduce the size of the workforce, employers should take caution and consult counsel. With employees denied work and special federal unemployment benefits scheduled to end during July, employers need to be prepared over the coming months for a spike in discrimination charges and related lawsuits.
As for vaccines, there is no publicly available vaccine for COVID-19 to date, but that day will come. The EEOC has stated an employer cannot compel its employees to take an influenza vaccine regardless of their medical conditions or religious beliefs. Instead, the current EEOC guidance urges employees to encourage employees to get vaccinated, as opposed to a blanket mandate that may pose risk. However, this area of the law may change in the time of COVID-19 and will be closely monitored by the SESSIONS FIRM.
Have questions? Don't worry - we are here the help!
News and Resources
The EEOC Publishes Additional Guidance For Employers- Part II: Accommodations
Posted on May 18, 2020 by sessionslegal
Categories
Archives
- ► March 2024
- ► February 2024
- ► December 2023
- ► November 2023
- ► August 2023
- ► July 2023
- ► June 2023
- ► May 2023
- ► April 2023
- ► March 2023
- ► February 2023
- ► January 2023
- ► October 2022
- ► September 2022
- ► August 2022
- ► June 2022
- ► May 2022
- ► April 2022
- ► March 2022
- ► February 2022
- ► January 2022
- ► December 2021
- ► November 2021
- ► October 2021
- ► September 2021
- ► August 2021
- ► June 2021
- ► May 2021
- ► April 2021
- ► March 2021
- ► February 2021
- ► January 2021
- ► December 2020
- ► November 2020
- ► October 2020
- ► September 2020
- ► August 2020
- ► July 2020
- ► June 2020
- ► May 2020
- ► April 2020
- ► March 2020
- ► February 2020
- ► January 2020
- ► December 2019
- ► October 2019
- ► September 2019
- ► August 2019
- ► July 2019
- ► May 2019
- ► April 2019
- ► March 2019
- ► February 2019
- ► January 2019
- ► December 2018
- ► October 2018
- ► September 2018
- ► August 2018
- ► July 2018
- ► June 2018
- ► May 2018
- ► April 2018
- ► March 2018
- ► February 2018
- ► January 2018
- ► December 2017
- ► November 2017
- ► October 2017
- ► September 2017
- ► August 2017
- ► July 2017
- ► June 2017
- ► April 2017
- ► March 2017
- ► August 2016
- ► June 2016
- ► May 2016
- ► April 2016
- ► March 2016
- ► February 2016
- ► December 2015
- ► October 2015
- ► August 2015
- ► July 2015
- ► June 2015
- ► March 2015
- ► February 2015
- ► January 2015
- ► December 2014
- ► November 2014
- ► October 2014
- ► September 2014
- ► August 2014
- ► July 2014
- ► June 2014
- ► May 2014
- ► April 2014
- ► February 2014
- ► January 2014
- ► November 2013
- ► September 2013
- ► July 2013
- ► June 2013
- ► May 2013
- ► April 2013
- ► March 2013
- ► January 2013
FOUNDED IN NEW ORLEANS, WE NOW SERVICE CLIENTS THROUGHOUT THE NATION
-
California
► San Diego
1550 Hotel Circle North
Suite 260
San Diego, California 92108T: (619) 758-1891
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
Florida
► Tampa
3350 Buschwood Park Dr.
Suite 195
Tampa, Florida 33618T: (813) 890-2460
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
Georgia
► Atlanta
56 Perimeter Center East
Suite 150 PMB 1070
Atlanta, Georgia 30346T: (678) 539-6030
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
Illinois
► Chicago
205 N. Michigan Ave.
Suite 810
Chicago, Illinois 60601T: (312) 578-0990
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
Michigan
► Brownstown Township
22845 Sylvan Ave.
Brownstown Twp, Michigan 48134T: (313) 351-2165
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
New Jersey
► Flemington
3 Cross Creek Drive
Flemington, New Jersey 08822T: (908) 237-1660
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
New York
► New York
180 Riverside Blvd
#302
New York, New York 10069T: (716) 636-5178
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
Pennsylvania
► Philadelphia
5 Canton Circle
Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940T: (215) 398-1653
► View Details
F: (877) 334-0661 -
Texas
► Dallas
900 Jackson Street
Suite 440
Dallas, Texas 75202T: (214) 741-3001
► View Details
F: (214) 741-3098